HTML5: The Battlefield Remains of an Unnecessary War, Part 4
by The H.E.A.T. Exchange
Discussion Point 1: When the Foundation of the Core is 80% Bullshit and 10% Concrete
SGML is a standard.
SGML defines the rules for organizing and tagging documents. Previous versions of HTML (before HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.1) were based on SGML.
HTML Living Standard from the WHATWG’s camp is not based on the SGML standard. No foundational standard has been declared for this so-called living standard. How can something be a standard when it is not based on a solid standard?
HTML Living Standard is the first level of bullshit.
I remember in art class the teacher telling me not to trace my circles from other students’ drawings. She told me that tracing will inherit the imperfections of something that may already have imperfections.
The computer clock or other consumer timing devices are often based on a standard timing mechanism: the atomic clock. This way, everybody can be synced up properly. If a computer based its timings on its owner’s wristwatch, chaos would reign over the web world.
HTML5 from the W3C is based on HTML Living Standard, which is not based on any known standard (don’t be fooled by the specifications name). Therefore, HTML5 was doomed from its creation to inherit and magnify the imperfections already prevalent in HTML Living Standard.
HTML5 is the second level of bullshit.
No rational thinking person on the face of planet Earth can deny this fact.
End of discussion point 1